理想的格言范例6篇

前言:中文期刊网精心挑选了理想的格言范文供你参考和学习,希望我们的参考范文能激发你的文章创作灵感,欢迎阅读。

理想的格言

理想的格言范文1

一个朋友说,她每次下车时,都会跟的哥说声谢谢。因为那一声谢谢,会让的哥们的表情变得柔和许多。

有一回,我送一位女乘客到长途车站,她下车后,急急忙忙要往对面冲,我顺口说了句:“别急,看着点儿车。”她听了,站在那里想了想,回头跟我说:“你等等,我找个朋友,然后还坐你的车!”

过了几分钟,她带过来一个男人,说要去旅顺。那男人边上车边唠叨:“不是说坐小客车去吗?早知道要打车,咱们还用约在这里等!”那女人跟我说,一来着急赶路,二来看我为人不错,就改了主意。

还有一次,我载了3个农民工,下车时,付钱的那个民工说:“谢谢你!”没想到,这几个民工注定要再一次感谢我,因为他们下车以后,把一个纸袋子忘在车上,等发现时,我已经在市区了。纸袋子里面有两条裤子、一条毛巾和一瓶没开封的男用护肤霜。我犹豫了一下,开车出了市区,在他们下车的地方,竟然找到了他们。他未必想得到,我空跑17公里,就因为他下车时跟我说了一声谢谢。

理解万岁

最让的哥烦心的事,莫过于排了很长时间的队,等来个小活儿。其实这种事说白了就是心态问题。

有一回在机场等客,因为有薄雾,一直等了两个多小时,才有客人出来。我帮客人装好行李,然后替他关上车门,出机场时他对我说:“抱歉,我到锦绣大酒店。”因为锦绣大酒店距离机场不多不少,正好2.9公里,接近基本里程又不蹦字,小活儿中这种活儿最没劲,更不用说我足足等了两个钟头。

但一路上我照样谈笑风生,谈天气,也谈这辆破车。转眼到了锦绣大酒店,他掏出10元钱递给我。我放在坐垫上,去帮他取出行李。这时,他又拿出30元钱递过来。我说:“您刚付过了,还没找您钱!”

他说:“那是车费,这是奖金,也可以说损失补偿费。够吧?”我这才隐约记起,他刚才问过我,从机场到市内,大约多少钱。

“奖金”我没有要,因为,理解万岁。

信任之美

的哥的工作是由一笔笔简单的生意串起来的,既然是生意,那会不会没有人情味?的哥认为,不会的。

做了这么多年的哥,真是什么事都见过。那天在人民路,一个女人没上车,把孩子放在后座,说:“师傅,麻烦把这孩子送到山东路。”她说她有急事,实在是脱不开身,只好这样了。我拒绝了她。那孩子顶多3岁,她居然放心交给一个陌生人。

她说:“求你了,师傅,但凡有办法,我也不干这事。”

“你是他什么人?”我警惕地问。

“我是他小姨。突然出了点儿事,实在不能带着他。”她看我还在犹豫,又说,“我跟他妈说了,你放心,没事。”

这种事没法让人放心。她又说刚才好不容易相中了个“面善”的的哥,可人家不干,所以求我千万帮帮忙:“出租车倒有的是,我也不能随便什么人都托付啊。”

我仔细地想了想各种可能,觉得没什么问题,加上那孩子叫了她小姨,也就放心了。把她和孩子妈妈的电话分别打出去确认后,我就带着孩子走了。说老实话,真有一点儿使命感。小家伙很可爱,我让他坐在前面,替他系好安全带,一路上跟他聊天,仿佛回到了跟儿子在一起的那些日子。

理想的格言范文2

一个能从别人的观念来看事情,能了解别人心灵活动的人,永远不必为自己的前途担心。

大多数人想要改造这个世界,但却罕有人想改造自己。

生活就像海洋,只有意志坚强的人,才能到达彼岸。

世上没有绝望的处境,只有对处境绝望的人。

如烟往事俱忘却,心底无私天地宽。

征服畏惧、建立自信的最快最确实的方法,就是去做你害怕的事,直到你获得成功的经验。

含泪播种的人一定能含笑收获。

再长的路,一步步也能走完,再短的路,不迈开双脚也无法到达。

莫找借口失败,只找理由成功。

不是每一次努力都会有收获,但是,每一次收获都必须努力,这是一个不公平的不可逆转的命题。

一个有信念者所开发出的力量,大于99个只有兴趣者。

理想的格言范文3

关键词 彩色图像分割 颜色空间 直方图阈值化 边缘检测 模糊方法 神经网络

中图分类号:TP312 文献标识码:A

1 数字图像技术概述

数字图像处理工具箱函数包括以下15类:(1)图像显示函数;(2)图像文件输入、输出函数;(3)图像几何操作函数;(4)图像像素值及统计函数;(5)图像分析函数;(6)图像增强函数;(7)线性滤波函数;(8)二维线性滤波器设计函数;(9)图像变换函数;(10)图像邻域及块操作函数;(11)二值图像操作函数;(12)基于区域的图像处理函数;(13)颜色图操作函数;(14)颜色空间转换函数;(15)图像类型和类型转换函数。

MATLAB图像处理工具箱支持四种图像类型,分别为真彩色图像、索引色图像、灰度图像、二值图像,由于有的函数对图像类型有限制,这四种类型可以用工具箱的类型转换函数相互转换。MATLAB可操作的图像文件包括JPG、HDF、JPEG、PCX、TIFF、XWD等格式。下面就图像处理的基本过程讨论工具箱所实现的常用功能。

图像的读写与显示操作:用imread( )读取图像,imwrite( )输出图像,把图像显示于屏幕有imshow( ),image( )等函数。imcrop()对图像进行裁剪,图像的插值缩放可用imresize( )函数实现,旋转用imrotate( )实现。

图像增强是数字图像处理过程中常用的一种方法,目的是采用一系列技术去改善图像的视觉效果或将图像转换成一种更适合于人眼观察和机器自动分析的形式。

2 MATLAB图像处理工具箱运用实例

为了证明MATLAB语言是一种简洁,可读性较强的高效率编程软件,本文通过运用图像处理工具箱中的有关函数对一实拍的芯片图像进行处理。如图1,图“Fig.jpg”为一幅原图像,该图像右边的剪切图像为从“Fig.jpg”中剪切出的将用于分析的子图像块。为了便于分析与观察,把子图像块旋转90度置于水平位置并把该图存在名为“Fig1.jpg”的图像文件中。以上的过程可用以下代码实现。

x=imread('E:\study\电子与通信\Term 2\数字图像处理DIP\Fig.jpg');

figure,imshow(x);

y=imcrop(x);

figure,imshow(y,[]);

z=imrotate(y,90);

imwrite(z,'E:\study\电子与通信\Term 2\数字图像处理DIP\Fig1.jpg','jpg');

isrgb(z)

原图Fig.jpg 剪贴图Fig1.jpg

图1

经判断得知该图像为一真彩色图像,首先把它转换为灰度图像,以下所有的进一步处理均采用经过灰度化处理后的图像作为原图。

通过比较灰度原图和经均衡化后的图形可见图像变得清晰,均衡化后的直方图形状比原直方图的形状更理想。效果比较见图2,程序代码如下:

x=imread('E:\study\电子与通信\Term 2\数字图像处理DIP\Fig1.jpg');

y=rgb2gray(x);

subplot(221),imshow(y);title('Fig1.jpg 灰度化图像');

subplot(222),imhist(y);title('均衡化前直方图');

I=histeq(y);

subplot(223),imshow(I);title('均衡化后图像');

subplot(224),imhist(I);title('均衡化后直方图');

图2

3 结论

以上图像处理实例只是对MATLAB图像工具箱的一小部分进行运用,经过更进一步的图像分割、二值化、归一化等处理,可以把芯片中的字符特征提取出来送入神经网络分类器进行识别,我们应用MATLAB神经网络工具箱对字符分类进行模拟仿真也取得了较好的效果。由此可以看出MATLAB语言简洁,可读性强,工具箱涉及的专业领域广泛且功能强大。图像工具箱几乎包括所有经典的图像处理方法。由于工具箱具有可靠性和开放性,我们可以方便地直接加以使用,也可以把自己的代码加到工具箱中以改进函数功能,同时,MATLAB中的小波工具箱也有许多函数可运用于图像处理技术。因此,在图像处理技术中使用MATLAB语言可以快速实现模拟仿真,大大提高实验效率, 如果要开发实用程序,MATLAB语言还可以通过MEX动态连接库实现与C语言的混合编程,为工程应用提供了更多的便利条件。

参考文献

[1] 王新成.高级图像处理技术[M] .北京:中国科学技术出版社,2001,18-90.

理想的格言范文4

(laughter)

camp was more like a keg party without any alcohol. and on the very first day our counselor gathered us all together and she taught us a cheer that she said we would be doing every day for the rest of the summer to instill camp spirit. and it went like this: "r-o-w-d-i-e, that's the way we spell rowdie. rowdie, rowdie, let's get rowdie." yeah. so i couldn't figure out for the life of me why we were supposed to be so rowdy, or why we had to spell this word incorrectly. (laughter) but i recited a cheer. i recited a cheer along with everybody else. i did my best. and i just waited for the time that i could go off and read my books.

but the first time that i took my book out of my suitcase, the coolest girl in the bunk came up to me and she asked me, "why are you being so mellow?" -- mellow, of course, being the exact opposite of r-o-w-d-i-e. and then the second time i tried it, the counselor came up to me with a concerned expression on her face and she repeated the point about camp spirit and said we should all work very hard to be outgoing.

and so i put my books away, back in their suitcase, and i put them under my bed, and there they stayed for the rest of the summer. and i felt kind of guilty about this. i felt as if the books needed me somehow, and they were calling out to me and i was forsaking them. but i did forsake them and i didn't open that suitcase again until i was back home with my family at the end of the summer.

now, i tell you this story about summer camp. i could have told you 50 others just like it -- all the times that i got the message that somehow my quiet and introverted style of being was not necessarily the right way to go, that i should be trying to pass as more of an extrovert. and i always sensed deep down that this was wrong and that introverts were pretty excellent just as they were. but for years i denied this intuition, and so i became a wall street lawyer, of all things, instead of the writer that i had always longed to be -- partly because i needed to prove to myself that i could be bold and assertive too. and i was always going off to crowded bars when i really would have preferred to just have a nice dinner with friends. and i made these self-negating choices so reflexively, that i wasn't even aware that i was making them.

now this is what many introverts do, and it's our loss for sure, but it is also our colleagues' loss and our communities' loss. and at the risk of sounding grandiose, it is the world's loss. because when it comes to creativity and to leadership, we need introverts doing what they do best. a third to a half of the population are introverts -- a third to a half. so that's one out of every two or three people you know. so even if you're an extrovert yourself, i'm talking about your coworkers and your spouses and your children and the person sitting next to you right now -- all of them subject to this bias that is pretty deep and real in our society. we all internalize it from a very early age without even having a language for what we're doing.

now to see the bias clearly you need to understand what introversion is. it's different from being shy. shyness is about fear of social judgment. introversion is more about, how do you respond to stimulation, including social stimulation. so extroverts really crave large amounts of stimulation, whereas introverts feel at their most alive and their most switched-on and their most capable when they're in quieter, more low-key environments. not all the time -- these things aren't absolute -- but a lot of the time. so the key then to maximizing our talents is for us all to put ourselves in the zone of stimulation that is right for us.

but now here's where the bias comes in. our most important institutions, our schools and our workplaces, they are designed mostly for extroverts and for extroverts' need for lots of stimulation. and also we have this belief system right now that i call the new groupthink, which holds that all creativity and all productivity comes from a very oddly gregarious place.

so if you picture the typical classroom nowadays: when i was going to school, we sat in rows. we sat in rows of desks like this, and we did most of our work pretty autonomously. but nowadays, your typical classroom has pods of desks -- four or five or six or seven kids all facing each other. and kids are working in countless group assignments. even in subjects like math and creative writing, which you think would depend on solo flights of thought, kids are now expected to act as committee members. and for the kids who prefer to go off by themselves or just to work alone, those kids are seen as outliers often or, worse, as problem cases. and the vast majority of teachers reports believing that the ideal student is an extrovert as opposed to an introvert, even though introverts actually get better grades and are more knowledgeable, according to research. (laughter)

okay, same thing is true in our workplaces. now, most of us work in open plan offices, without walls, where we are subject to the constant noise and gaze of our coworkers. and when it comes to leadership, introverts are routinely passed over for leadership positions, even though introverts tend to be very careful, much less likely to take outsize risks -- which is something we might all favor nowadays. and interesting research by adam grant at the wharton school has found that introverted leaders often deliver better outcomes than extroverts do, because when they are managing proactive employees, they're much more likely to let those employees run with their ideas, whereas an extrovert can, quite unwittingly, get so excited about things that they're putting their own stamp on things, and other people's ideas might not as easily then bubble up to the surface.

now in fact, some of our transformative leaders in history have been introverts. i'll give you some examples. eleanor roosevelt, rosa parks, gandhi -- all these peopled described themselves as quiet and soft-spoken and even shy. and they all took the spotlight, even though every bone in their bodies was telling them not to. and this turns out to have a special power all its own, because people could feel that these leaders were at the helm, not because they enjoyed directing others and not out of the pleasure of being looked at; they were there because they had no choice, because they were driven to do what they thought was right.

now i think at this point it's important for me to say that i actually love extroverts. i always like to say some of my best friends are extroverts, including my beloved husband. and we all fall at different points, of course, along the introvert/extrovert spectrum. even carl jung, the psychologist who first popularized these terms, said that there's no such thing as a pure introvert or a pure extrovert. he said that such a man would be in a lunatic asylum, if he existed at all. and some people fall smack in the middle of the introvert/extrovert spectrum, and we call these people ambiverts. and i often think that they have the best of all worlds. but many of us do recognize ourselves as one type or the other.

and what i'm saying is that culturally we need a much better balance. we need more of a yin and yang between these two types. this is especially important when it comes to creativity and to productivity, because when psychologists look at the lives of the most creative people, what they find are people who are very good at exchanging ideas and advancing ideas, but who also have a serious streak of introversion in them.

and this is because solitude is a crucial ingredient often to creativity. so darwin, he took long walks alone in the woods and emphatically turned down dinner party invitations. theodor geisel, better known as dr. seuss, he dreamed up many of his amazing creations in a lonely bell tower office that he had in the back of his house in la jolla, california. and he was actually afraid to meet the young children who read his books for fear that they were expecting him this kind of jolly santa claus-like figure and would be disappointed with his more reserved persona. steve wozniak invented the first apple computer sitting alone in his cubical in hewlett-packard where he was working at the time. and he says that he never would have become such an expert in the first place had he not been too introverted to leave the house when he was growing up.

now of course, this does not mean that we should all stop collaborating -- and case in point, is steve wozniak famously coming together with steve jobs to start apple computer -- but it does mean that solitude matters and that for some people it is the air that they breathe. and in fact, we have known for centuries about the transcendent power of solitude. it's only recently that we've strangely begun to forget it. if you look at most of the world's major religions, you will find seekers -- moses, jesus, buddha, muhammad -- seekers who are going off by themselves alone to the wilderness where they then have profound epiphanies and revelations that they then bring back to the rest of the community. so no wilderness, no revelations.

this is no surprise though if you look at the insights of contemporary psychology. it turns out that we can't even be in a group of people without instinctively mirroring, mimicking their opinions. even about seemingly personal and visceral things like who you're attracted to, you will start aping the beliefs of the people around you without even realizing that that's what you're doing.

and groups famously follow the opinions of the most dominant or charismatic person in the room, even though there's zero correlation between being the best talker and having the best ideas -- i mean zero. so ... (laughter) you might be following the person with the best ideas, but you might not. and do you really want to leave it up to chance? much better for everybody to go off by themselves, generate their own ideas freed from the distortions of group dynamics, and then come together as a team to talk them through in a well-managed environment and take it from there.

now if all this is true, then why are we getting it so wrong? why are we setting up our schools this way and our workplaces? and why are we making these introverts feel so guilty about wanting to just go off by themselves some of the time? one answer lies deep in our cultural history. western societies, and in particular the u.s., have always favored the man of action over the man of contemplation and "man" of contemplation. but in america's early days, we lived in what historians call a culture of character, where we still, at that point, valued people for their inner selves and their moral rectitude. and if you look at the self-help books from this era, they all had titles with things like "character, the grandest thing in the world." and they featured role models like abraham lincoln who was praised for being modest and unassuming. ralph waldo emerson called him "a man who does not offend by superiority."

but then we hit the 20th century and we entered a new culture that historians call the culture of personality. what happened is we had evolved an agricultural economy to a world of big business. and so suddenly people are moving from small towns to the cities. and instead of working alongside people they've known all their lives, now they are having to prove themselves in a crowd of strangers. so, quite understandably, qualities like magnetism and charisma suddenly come to seem really important. and sure enough, the self-help books change to meet these new needs and they start to have names like "how to win friends and influence people." and they feature as their role models really great salesmen. so that's the world we're living in today. that's our cultural inheritance.

now none of this is to say that social skills are unimportant, and i'm also not calling for the abolishing of teamwork at all. the same religions who send their sages off to lonely mountain tops also teach us love and trust. and the problems that we are facing today in fields like science and in economics are so vast and so complex that we are going to need armies of people coming together to solve them working together. but i am saying that the more freedom that we give introverts to be themselves, the more likely that they are to come up with their own unique solutions to these problems.

so now i'd like to share with you what's in my suitcase today. guess what? books. i have a suitcase full of books. here's margaret atwood, "cat's eye." here's a novel by milan kundera. and here's "the guide for the perplexed" by maimonides. but these are not exactly my books. i brought these books with me because they were written by my grandfather's favorite authors.

my grandfather was a rabbi and he was a widower who lived alone in a small apartment in brooklyn that was my favorite place in the world when i was growing up, partly because it was filled with his very gentle, very courtly presence and partly because it was filled with books. i mean literally every table, every chair in this apartment had yielded its original function to now serve as a surface for swaying stacks of books. just like the rest of my family, my grandfather's favorite thing to do in the whole world was to read.

but he also loved his congregation, and you could feel this love in the sermons that he gave every week for the 62 years that he was a rabbi. he would takes the fruits of each week's reading and he would weave these intricate tapestries of ancient and humanist thought. and people would come from all over to hear him speak.

but here's the thing about my grandfather. underneath this ceremonial role, he was really modest and really introverted -- so much so that when he delivered these sermons, he had trouble making eye contact with the very same congregation that he had been speaking to for 62 years. and even away from the podium, when you called him to say hello, he would often end the conversation prematurely for fear that he was taking up too much of your time. but when he died at the age of 94, the police had to close down the streets of his neighborhood to accommodate the crowd of people who came out to mourn him. and so these days i try to learn from my grandfather's example in my own way.

so i just published a book about introversion, and it took me about seven years to write. and for me, that seven years was like total bliss, because i was reading, i was writing, i was thinking, i was researching. it was my version of my grandfather's hours of the day alone in his library. but now all of a sudden my job is very different, and my job is to be out here talking about it, talking about introversion. (laughter) and that's a lot harder for me, because as honored as i am to be here with all of you right now, this is not my natural milieu.

so i prepared for moments like these as best i could. i spent the last year practicing public speaking every chance i could get. and i call this my "year of speaking dangerously." (laughter) and that actually helped a lot. but i'll tell you, what helps even more is my sense, my belief, my hope that when it comes to our attitudes to introversion and to quiet and to solitude, we truly are poised on the brink on dramatic change. i mean, we are. and so i am going to leave you now with three calls for action for those who share this vision.

number one: stop the madness for constant group work. just stop it. (laughter) thank you. (applause) and i want to be clear about what i'm saying, because i deeply believe our offices should be encouraging casual, chatty cafe-style types of interactions -- you know, the kind where people come together and serendipitously have an exchange of ideas. that is great. it's great for introverts and it's great for extroverts. but we need much more privacy and much more freedom and much more autonomy at work. school, same thing. we need to be teaching kids to work together, for sure, but we also need to be teaching them how to work on their own. this is especially important for extroverted children too. they need to work on their own because that is where deep thought comes from in part.

okay, number two: go to the wilderness. be like buddha, have your own revelations. i'm not saying that we all have to now go off and build our own cabins in the woods and never talk to each other again, but i am saying that we could all stand to unplug and get inside our own heads a little more often.

number three: take a good look at what's inside your own suitcase and why you put it there. so extroverts, maybe your suitcases are also full of books. or maybe they're full of champagne glasses or skydiving equipment. whatever it is, i hope you take these things out every chance you get and grace us with your energy and your joy. but introverts, you being you, you probably have the impulse to guard very carefully what's inside your own suitcase. and that's okay. but occasionally, just occasionally, i hope you will open up your suitcases for other people to see, because the world needs you and it needs the things you carry.

so i wish you the best of all possible journeys and the courage to speak softly.

thank you very much.

理想的格言范文5

关键词:城市网格化管理;资源共享;整合

中图分类号:F29文献标识码:A文章编号:1672-3198(2009)01-0045-01

1 城市网格化管理中资源共享的现存问题

(1)城市管理资源分散,职能交叉,城市管理顽疾问题无法得到有效处理。

(2)城市管理处置力量各自为政,存在着“既多又少”的怪现象。

一方面,各专业局都建有自己专业的巡视、处置队伍,总人数超过实际需求量;另一方面,每一个专业局又都反映力量不够,无法满足管理任务的需要。

(3)网格化管理的信息资源共享程度不高,指挥、调度、决策的效率较低。

2 城市网格化管理中资源共享的优化目标

(1)整合优化城市管理资源,建立全时段监控、全区域覆盖的城市管理体系,为创新城市管理体制,解决城市管理模式中资源分散、责任不清、重复作业、浪费资源等问题;

(2)按照资源网格的要求,设计良好的“随需应变”信息资源共享机制,根据城市管理案件的发生规律合理配置资源,提高资源的技术水平、共享能力与调配效率;

(3)通过资源共享的优化实现区政府、监督中心、指挥中心、相关专业管理部门之间的管理资源、人力资源和信息资源的共享、达到城市管理主动、精确、快速、统一的目标。

3 城市网格化管理中资源共享的优化手段

(1)完善现有“两轴”组织体制,强化两轴的权威性,统筹协调各职能管理部门。

要彻底解决管理资源共享难的问题,必须整合政府管理职能,建立一个强有力的指挥派遣中心,对城市管理资源实行统一指挥调度。建立“两轴”管理体制是整合政府职能,解决城市管理工作中职能管理部门多头管理、职能交叉、职责不到位现象的必然要求,应出台相应的城市管理法律法规文件,明确指挥、监督中心的职责,从城市管理流程、部件和事件的处置上强化两个中心的职能和权威性。

(2)加强城市管理巡视队伍的整合。

城市管理力量分散是制约城市管理水平提高的重要因素。可以从两个方面进行整合,一是整合城市管理专业部门的处置力量,建议由区监督中心与各专业职能部门进行沟通协商,加强对网格化巡视员的培训,适当改善其待遇,力争将全区域的巡视任务承担下来,尽量减少专业管理部门的巡视任务。二是整合城市管理专业部门和各街道办事处的处置力量。建议由指挥中心协调各专业部门和各街道办事处,将其全面整合在一起,形成条块协调一致,密切配合,共同对全区的城市管理负责。

(3)强化网格化信息系统平台的建设。

从三个方面加强信息系统平台的建设:①市、区、街道三级信息平台建设要明确重点,合理分工、规划设计促进三级层面信息共享;②网格化信息平台与各专业部门平台要互连互通。两者要在功能配置、信息流转方面设置相应接口,确保城市管理网格化信息与各职能部门的业务信息系统的互联互通。③加强共享数据库的规划。规划建立可充分反映城市管理基本特性的、统一的、及时的、可共享的城市管理数据库。

(4)建立资源共享的激励与约束机制,促使资源共享机制长效化。

首先要理清各个职能部门参与网格化管理的资源共享成本收益。即职能部门采取单独管理和资源共享管理两种做法的成本和收益,并以此建立科学的财政预算补偿机制,对资源共享行为进行激励。其次要在绩效评估体系和控制机制中纳入资源共享的评价指标。如设立资源共享程度指标、业务协同指标,对跨部门资源共享的业务增加评分权重等。

(5)引入服务外包与政府购买服务策略。

通过服务外包与政府购买服务的方式来解决资源与成本的问题,不断提高运行效率。建议根据需要购买如下服务项目:市政设施养护、污水处理、路灯设施维护、环卫清扫保洁、水资源监测、城区绿化养护等。实施政府购买公共服务不仅减轻了财政负担,提高了政府城市管理的水平和效率,而且还能通过财政资金的引导作用吸引更多的民间资本参与城市管理和建设。

4 结语

资源共享是城市网格化管理的一大优势所在,是网格化管理顺利运作的保障。随着信息技术的不断发展,资源共享的范围和深度也会有越来越不同的需求,需要不断的深入研究。

参考文献

[1]陈平.网格化城市管理新模式.[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2006,(7).

[2]陈平.依托数字城市技术,创建城市管理新模式[J].中国科学院院刊,2005.

理想的格言范文6

    第二乐段:这一段的情绪与第一段的情绪形成鲜明的对比,明朗的色彩完全消失,为了表现出惨痛、仇恨的情绪,“现在”两字要用快而带恨的语气,呼吸急促,咬字、吐字结实有力并短促,把心中愤恨的情绪毫无保留地表达出来。“一切都改变了”,要突出强调“改变”的“改”字,表达出主人公不愿意看到的现实。第二句“现在,已经是野兽的屠场”,在前一句的基础上,更要加强愤恨的语气,音量上加强,重点强调“野兽”和“屠场”几个字,演唱这两句时还应注意把握分寸,咬字、吐字不能太僵硬。第二部分的后半段“故乡,故乡,我的母亲,我的家呢? 哪一天才能回到你的怀里,那一切是否能依然无恙?”演唱时注意把握“故乡”二字的音色和力度变化,亲切、柔和而舒展,仿佛使人们听到作者对故乡的发自内心的和呼唤。然后是“我的母亲,我的家呢”? 应该突出“我”字,表达出问自己、问全中国人民的心声——母亲在哪里? 家在哪里?“哪一天才能回到你的怀里,那一切是否能依然无恙”,这两句是整个歌曲的和核心,让整首歌曲在富有激情的中结束。演唱者带着激愤的情绪,使感情不断高涨,将听众的情绪完全带到歌声中来,抓住听众的心,激动听众、感动听众,让听众在心里和演唱者一起呼唤。为了表现出惨痛的、仇恨的、激情的情绪,呼吸气势上要增强,咬字要结实有力,声音和语言可以接近于朗诵,富有戏剧性,然后在“能”字时迅速停顿, 依然无恙”几个字从心里推出,把整首歌曲的主题——我的故乡是否能依然无恙交代清楚。最后,虽然歌声已经停止了,但演唱者心里却仍然在继续歌唱着,情绪要等到钢琴伴奏把最后一个音弹完后才可终止。

    总之,对一首歌曲的分析理解只是演唱的依据,要想完整地表达歌曲内涵,演唱者必须在努力提高自己的技能技巧、艺术修养、文化造诣以及培养自己丰富而健康的情感的同时,认真理解作品,领会作曲家的意图,对歌曲的曲式、调性、速度、节奏、和声、力度等方面都要进行具体分析和总体把握。甚至在每个字、每个乐句、每个装饰音上,都要下苦功夫,反复练唱,精心琢磨,仔细品味。特别是演唱处理中的对比变化,不能呆板,更不能公式化和形式化地照搬,应根据歌曲的思想内容,音乐旋律的起伏变化和情境、情绪、情感的逻辑性,逐步发展,从而达到高度的艺术表现之目的。

    今天,我们已取得了社会主义现代化建设的巨大成就,但每当演唱这首陆华柏的《故乡》时,那贯穿全曲的令人沉思的主题音乐、动人的音调以及完美的艺术形象,一次次地激起我们对祖国的热爱和对老一辈革命家的无限怀念,从而更加珍惜今天的幸福生活,更加向往和平。

    参考文献:

    [1 ]王伟任,王顺通.音乐欣赏教程[M].北京:人民音乐出版社.

    [2 ]余笃刚.声乐语言艺术[M].长沙:湖南文艺出版社,2000.